An interdisciplinary story-and-simulation approach for assessing forest type changes and shifts in ecosystem service potential

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2026.02.01

Keywords:

Bavaria, Delphi method, ecosystem services, forestry, forest scenarios and development, InVEST Generator, story and simulation approach

Abstract

Forest management has increasingly shifted from timber-focused production to multifunctionality, requiring scenario approaches that integrate socio-economic contexts and expert knowledge. For robust assessments of ecosystem service potentials (ESP), three key dimensions must be addressed: realism, by incorporating expert-based knowledge and socio-economic constraints; scalability, through standardized modeling techniques; and comparability, by ensuring applicability across different regions and forest types. We developed an interdisciplinary “story and simulation” approach, combining expert-based Delphi assessments with spatially explicit scenario modeling to assess ESP changes in Bavaria, Germany. This method integrates stakeholder perspectives with empirical ecosystem service models to enhance realism while maintaining scalability and comparability for broader applications. We assessed three scenarios of forest change: a Status Quo Scenario with stable drivers, an Intensified Use Scenario, and a Close-to-Nature Forestry Scenario. Across all scenarios, a transition from conifer-dominated forests toward mixed and broadleaf forests was expected, affecting between one-third and nearly half of the current coniferous forest area. The empirical ESP models revealed stable ESP levels at the landscape level, with only minor scenario-driven variations. We show that including socio-economic factors through an expert-driven approach reveals more moderate shifts than those predicted by purely optimization-based models. The projected transition towards mixed forests aligns with current European forest policy trends, but the speed and extent of this shift remain uncertain. Our interdisciplinary framework enhances realism by incorporating expert knowledge, improves scalability by utilizing empirical ESP models, and ensures comparability through a structured, transferable approach. This methodology provides a robust foundation for evidence-based forest policy, adaptable to diverse forest ecosystems and governance structures.

References

Albert M, Schmidt M (2010) Climate-sensitive modelling of site-productivity relationships for Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Forest Ecology and Management 259 :739–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.04.039

Alcamo J (2008) The SAS approach: Combining qualitative and quantitative knowledge in environmental scenarios. Alcamo J (ed) Environmental futures: The practice of environmental scenario analysis: 123–150). Amsterdam.

Augustynczik A, Yousefpour R (2021) Assessing the synergistic value of ecosystem services in European beech forests. Ecosystem Services 49: 101264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101264

Begemann A, Giessen L, Roitsch D, Roux JL, Lovric M, Azevedo-Ramos C, Boerner J, Beeko C, Cashore B, Cerutti P, de Jong W, Fosse L, Hinrichs A, Humphreys D, Pülzl H, Santamaria C, Sotirov M, Wunder S, Winkel G (2021) Quo vadis global forest governance? A transdisciplinary Delphi study. Environmental Science and Policy 123: 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.03.011

BExIS (Biodiversity Exploratories Information System) editing status 2023-05-10. https://doi.org/10.17616/R32P9Q

Biber P, Borges J., Moshammer R, Barreiro S, Botequim B, Brodrechtová Y, Brukas V, Chirici G, Cordero-Debets R, Corrigan E, Eriksson L, Favero M, Galev E, Garcia-Gonzalo J, Hengeveld G, Kavaliauskas M, Marchetti M, Marques S, Mozgeris G, Navrátil R, Nieuwenhuis M, Orazio C, Paligorov I, Pettenella D, Sedmák R, Smreček R, Stanislovaitis A, Tomé M, Trubins R, Tuček J, Vizzarri M, Wallin I, Pretzsch H, Sallnäs O (2015) How sensitive are ecosystem services in European forest landscapes to silvicultural treatment? Forests 6: 1666–1695. https://doi.org/10.3390/f6051666

BMEL (Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture) (2014) Der Wald in Deutschland. Ausgewählte Ergebnisse der dritten Bundeswaldinventur. https://www.bundeswaldinventur.de/dritte-bundeswaldinventur-2012

Borrass L, Kleinschmit D, Winkel G (2017) The “German model” of integrative multifunctional forest management—Analysing the emergence and political evolution of a forest management concept. Forest Policy and Economics 77: 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.02

Bowditch E, Santopuoli G, Binder F, del Río M, La Porta N, Kluvankova T, Lesinski J, Motta R, Pach M, Panzacchi P, Pretzsch H, Temperli C, Tonon G, Smith M, Velikova V, Weatherall A, Tognetti R (2020) What is climate-smart forestry? A definition from a multinational collaborative process focused on mountain regions of Europe. Ecosystem Services 43: 101113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101113

Dalkey NC, Helmer O (1963) An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science 9: 458–467.

Delbecq A, Van de Ven A, Gustafson D (1975) Group techniques for program planning. A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview IL.

Dice L (1945) Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26: 297–302. https://doi.org/10.2307/1932409

Dörr H, Fiby M, Hilbert A (2015) Raumbezogene Ergebnisse der Delphi-Umfrage zur Zukunft der Landschaft in Regionen Süddeutschlands, Österreichs und der nördlichen Schweiz. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4001.2965

Duguma DW, Schultner J, Abson D, Fischer J (2022) From stories to maps: Translating participatory scenario narratives into spatially explicit information. Ecology and Society 27: 13. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13200-270213

Dupras J, Patry C, Tittler R, Gonzalez A, Alam M, Messier C (2016) Management of vegetation under electric distribution lines will affect the supply of multiple ecosystem service. Land Use Policy 51: 66–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.11.005

Eggers J, Holmgren S, Nordström EM, Lämås T, Lind T, Öhman A (2019) Balancing different forest values: Evaluation of forest management scenarios in a multi-criteria decision analysis framework. Forest Policy and Economics 103: 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.07.002

Eggers J, Räty M, Öhman K, Snäll T (2020) How well do stakeholder-defined forest management scenarios balance economic and ecological forest values? Forests 11: 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010086

Egri CP (1999) The environmental round table role-play exercise: The dynamics of multistakeholder decision-making processes. Journal of Management Education 23: 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256299902300110

Fagerholm N, Martín-López B, Torralba M, Oteros-Rozas E, Lechner A, Bieling C, Olafsson A, Albert C, Raymond C, Garcia-Martin M, Gulsrud N, Plieninger T (2020) Perceived contributions of multifunctional landscapes to human well-being: Evidence from 13 European sites. People and Nature 2: 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10067

Filyushkina A, Strange N, Löf M, Ezebilo EE, Boman M (2018) Applying the Delphi method to assess impacts of forest management on biodiversity and habitat preservation. Forest Ecology and Management 409: 179-189. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.022

Filyushkina A, Widenfalk LA, Nordström EV, Laudon H, Ranius T (2022) Expert assessment of landscape-level conservation strategies in boreal forests for biodiversity, recreation and water quality. Journal for Nature Conservation 67: 126180.

Fox J, Weisberg S (2019) An R companion to applied regression. Thousand Oaks.

Glatthorn J, Annighöfer P, Balkenhol N, Leuschner C, Polle A, Scheu S, Schuldt A, Schuldt B, Ammer C (2021) An interdisciplinary framework to describe and evaluate the functioning of forest ecosystems. Basic and Applied Ecology 52: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.02.006

Gregor K, Reyer C, Nagel, T., Mäkelä, A., Krause A, Knoke T, Rammig A (2024) Reconciling the EU forest, biodiversity, and climate strategies. Global Change Biology 30: e17431. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17431

Häder M (2009) Delphi-Befragungen. Ein Arbeitsbuch. Wiesbaden.

Hallberg-Sramek I, Nordström EM, Priebe J, Reimerson E, Marald E, Nordin A (2023) Combining scientific and local knowledge improves evaluating future scenarios of forest ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 60: 101512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101512

Hartigan JA, Wong MA (1979) Algorithm AS 136: A K-means clustering algorithm. Applied Statistics 28: 100–108. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346830

Hauck J, Görg C, Varjopuro R, Ratamäki O, Maes J, Wittmer H, Jax K (2013) “Maps have an air of authority”: Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making. Ecosystem Services 4: 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.11.003

Hoogstra-Klein M, Hengeveld G, de Jong R (2017) Analysing scenario approaches for forest management - One decade of experiences in Europe. Forest Policy and Economics 85: 222–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.10.002

IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services)(2019) Summary for policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3553579

Jenkins M, Schaap B (2018) Forest ecosystem services. Background study prepared for the thirteenth session of the United Nations Forum on Forests. https://www.un.org/esa/forests/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/UNFF13_BkgdStudy_ForestsEcoServices.pdf.

Jurmalis E, Bardule A, Donis J, Gerra-Inohosa L, Libiete Z (2023) Forest inventory data provide useful information for mapping ecosystem services potential. Land 12: 1836. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12101836

Kassa H, Campbell B, Sandewall M, Kebede M, Tesfaye Y, Dessie G, Seifu A, Tadesse M, Garedew E, Sandewall K (2009) Building future scenarios and uncovering persisting challenges of participatory forest management in Chilimo Forest, Central Ethiopia. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 1004–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.03.009

Kendall JE, Kendall KE, Smithson S, Angell IO (1992) SEER: A divergent methodology applied to forecasting the future roles of the systems analyst. Human Systems Management 11: 123–135. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-1992-11303

Kok K, Bärlund I, Flörke M, Holman I, Gramberger M, Sendzimir J, Stuch B, Zellmer K (2015) European participatory scenario development: Strengthening the link between stories and models. Climatic Change 128: 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1143-y

Lee G, Jun KS, Kang M (2019) Framework to prioritize watersheds for diffuse pollution management in the Republic of Korea: Application of multi-criteria analysis using the Delphi method. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 19: 2767–2779. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2767-2019

Lee CF, King B (2009) A determination of destination competitiveness for Taiwan’s hot springs tourism sector using the Delphi technique. Journal of Vacation Marketing 15: 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356766709104270

Lodin I, Eriksson LO, Forsell N, Korosuo A (2020) Combining climate change mitigation scenarios with current forest owner behavior: A scenario study from a region in Southern Sweden. Forests 11: 346. https://doi:10.3390/f11030346

MacLean MG, Duveneck MJ, Plisinski J, Morreale LL, Laflower D, Thompson JR (2021) Forest carbon trajectories: Consequences of alternative land-use scenarios in New England. Global Environmental Change 69: 102310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102310

Manning P, van der Plas F, Soliveres S, Allan E, Maestre FT, Mace G, Whittingham MJ, Fischer M (2018) Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature Ecology and Evolution 2: 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0461-7

Meraj G, Singh S, Kanga S, Islam M (2022) Modeling on comparison of ecosystem services concepts, tools, methods and their ecological‑economic implications: A review. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment 8: 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01131-6

Morán-Ordóñez A, Roces-Díaz JV, Otsu K, Ameztegui A, Coll L, Lefevre F, Retana J, Brotons L (2019) The use of scenarios and models to evaluate the future of nature values and ecosystem services in Mediterranean forests. Regional Environmental Change 19: 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1408-5

Mozgeris G, Brukas V, Stanislovaitis A, Kavaliauskas M, Palicinas M (2017) Owner mapping for forest scenario modelling - A Lithuanian case study. Forest Policy and Economics 85: 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.02.002

Nelson E, Mendoza, G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron DR, Chan KM, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Lonsdorf E, Naidoo R, Ricketts TH, Shaw MR (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 4. https://doi.org/10.1890/080023

Nordström EM, Nieuwenhuis M, Başkent EZ, Biber P, Black K, Borges J, Bugalho M, Corradini G, Corrigan E, Eriksson L, Felton A, Forsell N, Hengeveld G, Hoogstra-Klein M, Korosuo A, Lindbladh M, Lodin I, Lundholm A, Marto M, Masiero M, Mozgeris G, Pettenella D, Poschenrieder W, Sedmak R, Tucek J, Zoccatelli D (2019) Forest decision support systems for the analysis of ecosystem services provisioning at the landscape scale under global climate and market change scenarios. European Journal of Forest Research 138: 561–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-019-01189-z

Okoli C, Pawlowski SD (2004) The Delphi method as a research tool. An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management 42: 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002

Peltola T, Tuomisaari J (2016) Re-inventing forestry expertise: Strategies for coping with biodiversity protection in Finland. Forest Policy and Economics 62: 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.005.

Peter S, Le Provost G, Mehring M, Müller T, Manning P (2022) Cultural worldviews consistently explain bundles of ecosystem service prioritisation across rural Germany. People and Nature 4: 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10277

Petrolia DR, Nyanzu F, Cebrian J, Harri A, Amato J, Walton WC (2020) Eliciting expert judgment to inform management of diverse oyster resources for multiple ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Management 268: 110676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110676

Polley H (2011) Survey instructions for the 3rd National Forest Inventory (2011–2012). Bonn.

Poschenrieder W, Grote R, Pretzsch H (2013) Extending a physiological forest growth model by an observation-based tree competition module improves spatial representation of diameter growth. European Journal of Forest Research 132: 943–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-013-0730-1

Price J, Silbernagel J, Miller N, Swaty R, White M, Nixon K (2012) Eliciting expert knowledge to inform landscape modeling of conservation scenarios. Ecological Modelling 229: 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.09.010

R Core Team (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna.

Regos A, Aquilué N, López I, Codina M, Retana J, Brotons L (2016) Synergies between forest biomass extraction for bioenergy and fire suppression in Mediterranean ecosystems: Insights from a storyline-and-simulation approach. Ecosystems 19: 786–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-9968-z

Revez A, Dunphy N, Harris C, Mullally G, Lennon B, Gaffney C (2020) Beyond forecasting: Using a modified Delphi method to build upon participatory action research in developing principles for a just and inclusive energy transition. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920903218

Sacher P, Mayer M (2019). Szenarien der Waldentwicklung in Bayern bis 2045 und 2075 – Ergebnisse einer Delphi-Studie mit ausgewählten Waldexperten. Greifswalder Geographische Arbeiten 56. https://geo.uni-greifswald.de/institut/schriftenreihen/greifswalder-geographische-arbeiten/

Schwaiger F, Poschenrieder W, Biber P, Pretzsch H (2019) Ecosystem service trade-offs for adaptive forest management. Ecosystem Services 39: 100993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100993

Sharp R, Tallis H, Ricketts T, Guerry A, Wood S, Chaplin-Kramer R, Nelson E, Ennaanay D, Wolny S, Olwero N, Tallis H, Vigerstol K, Pennington D, Mendoza G, Aukema J, Foster J, Forrest J, Cameron D, Arkema K, Lonsdorf E, Kennedy C, Verutes G, Kim CK, Guannel G, Papenfus M, Toft J, Marsik M, Bernhardt J, Griffin R, Glowinski K, Chaumont N, Perelman A, Lacayo-Emery M, Mandle L, Hamel P, Vogl A, Rogers L, Bierbower W, Denu D, Douglass J (2014) InVEST 3.5.0 user’s guide. Stanford.

Simons NK, Felipe-Lucia MR, Schall P, Ammer C, Bauhus J, Blüthgen N, Boch S, Buscot F, Fischer M, Goldmann K, Gossner MM, Hänsel F, Jung K, Manning P, Nauss T, Oelmann Y, Pena R, Polle A, Renner SC, Schloter M, Schöning I, Schulze ED, Solly EF, Sorkau E, Stempfhuber B, Wubet T, Müller J, Seibold S, Weisser WW (2021) National Forest Inventories capture the multifunctionality of managed forests in Germany. Forest Ecosystems 8: 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-021-00280-5

Strand J, Carson RT, Navrud S, Ortiz-Bobea A, Vincent JR (2017) Using the Delphi method to value protection of the Amazon rainforest. Ecological Economics 131: 475–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.028

Suárez-Muñoz M, Bonet-García FJ, Navarro-Cerrillo R, Herrero J, Mina M (2023) Forest management scenarios drive future dynamics of Mediterranean planted pine forests under climate change. Landscape Ecology 38: 2069–2084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-023-01678-y

Tew E, Simmons B, Sutherland W (2019) Quantifying cultural ecosystem services: Disentangling the effects of management from landscape features. People and Nature 1: 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.14

Thuenen-Institute (2016) Dritte Bundeswaldinventur – Basisdaten (2016). Retrieved from https://bwi.info/Download/de/BWI-Basisdaten/ Retrieved 02.03.2026

Trombetti M, Ivits E, Vandecasteele I, Zulian G, Baranzelli C, Barranco R (2015) Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services: Trends in ecosystems and ecosystem services in the European Union between 2000 and 2010. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2788/341839

Turoff M (1970) The design of a policy Delphi. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2: 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(70)90161-7

Van der Plas F, Ratcliffe S, Ruiz-Benito P, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Verheyen K, Wirth C, Zavala M, Ampoorter E, Baeten L, Barbaro L, Bastias C, Bauhus J, Benavides R, Benneter A, Bonal D, Bouriaud O, Bruelheide H, Bussotti F, Carnol M, Castagneyrol B, Charbonnier Y, Cornelissen J, Dahlgren J, Checko E, Coppi A, Dawud S, Deconchat M, De Smedt P, De Wandeler H, Domisch T, Finér L, Fotelli M, Gessler A, Granier A, Grossiord C, Guyot V, Haase J, Hättenschwiler S, Jactel H, Jaroszewicz B, Joly FX, Jucker T, Kambach S, Kaendler G, Kattge J, Koricheva J, Kunstler G, Lehtonen A, Liebergesell M, Manning P, Milligan H, Müller S, Muys B, Nguyen D, Nock C, Ohse B, Paquette A, Penuelas J, Pollastrini M, Radoglou K, Raulund-Rasmussen K, Roger F, Seidl R, Selvi F, Stenlid J, Valladares F, van Keer J, Vesterdal L, Fischer M, Gamfeldt L, Allan E (2018) Continental mapping of forest ecosystem functions reveals a high but unrealized potential for forest multifunctionality. Ecology Letters 21: 31-42. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/ele.12868

Zhang C, Li J, Zhou Z (2022) Ecosystem service cascade: Concept, review, application and prospect. Ecological Indicators 137: 108766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108766

Zukunftsbaum Bayern (2023) Waldfläche in Bayern. Retrieved from https://www.zukunftsbaum-bayern.de/wald-in-bayern/

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-03-06

How to Cite

Sacher, P., Mayer, M., Job, H., & Simons, N. (2026). An interdisciplinary story-and-simulation approach for assessing forest type changes and shifts in ecosystem service potential. ERDKUNDE. https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2026.02.01

Issue

Section

Research Article